The Universal Periodic Review process reviews the human rights record within a country based on three documents: 1) a report submitted by the national government of the country under review; 2) a report compiled by the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) consisting of information contained in the reports of treaty bodies and special procedures concerning the country, including its observations and comments, and other relevant official UN documents; and 3) an OHCHR compilation of information that is credible and reliable from other stakeholders, including NGOs and national human rights institutions.

​

Each country undergoing review takes part in a 3.5-hour Q&A session, in which any UN member state is able to ask questions and make recommendations.  One hour and ten minutes of the session is provided to the national government to present its report; respond to any written questions from other UN member states that it may have received prior to the review; respond to oral questions, comments, and recommendations during the review; and present its conclusions.

​

Following this session, a “troika” of rapporteurs—a group of three Human Rights Council members selected by lot, aided by a member of the Secretariat (OHCHR)—produce the report of the review.  The report must accurately reflect the debate and must include all recommendations made to the national government by other member states.  The national government is then given the primary responsibility to implement the recommendations or to decline recommendations it does not wish to undertake.  Two days following the review, the Working Group presents the report for adoption.  For two weeks after the adoption, factual errors can be corrected through the request of delegations.  Finally, as part of the process, countries follow up on recommendations to improve their internal human rights situation.